Sunday, December 27, 2009
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Monday, November 9, 2009
Although the congressional leaders in the secret meeting did achieve complete bipartisanship in their determination to keep others from going Cao’s ethical route, there was less agreement on the best way to accomplish that.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Monday, November 2, 2009
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
A Real Stimulating Stimulus
For young folks, getting stimulated usually involves a Significant Other or a Significant Fantasy. For those of us getting Social Security Checks, it involves the Obama Administration and the New York Times.
Can we do better? Yes we can!
Some might find President Obama or members of his administration cute, but the Good Grey Lady of Times Square? Good God, has it come to that?
What it’s come to is that the Obama crowd and the Times are on opposite sides of the debate on how best to stimulate Social Security recipients. Many of us are still fully capable of telling what stimulus should be applied where and when, but Dr. Obama seems to think that $250 in government stimulation will work better than private stimulation.
True, with a Senior Discount, $250 might actually pay for reasonably classy stimulation, maybe even near Times Square, but that’s not the view of the New York Times. The Times harrumphs in an editorial that the $250 proposed because inflation fell and there won’t be a Social Security Cost of Living Adjustment this year is just politics:
“The Obama administration has called for an expensive crowd-pleaser of dubious effectiveness: sending every Social Security recipient an extra $250,” says the Times.
The crowd the Times is worried about Obama pleasing is the 57 million or so Americans who get Social Security checks and whose politics have matured from the age of All You Need Is Love to the current Baby Boomer theme -- You Screw Us and We’ll Screw You At The Polls.
Which is why the Obama administration, which includes strong vote-counting ability among its core talents, proposed the stimulus. And it’s also why the Times is upset, since doing anything that smacks of market-oriented, vote-driven politics makes the Times Politburo nervous.
As long as this debate goes on, nobody wins. The Obama administration isn’t pumping some $13 billion into the economy under the cloak of Senior Stimulation, the New York Times isn’t advancing its agenda, and seniors are left, at best, with do-it-yourself stimulation.
So here’s a proposed better way:
Every single adult member of the population will be issued a $125 voucher. The voucher itself will be worthless unless it’s combined with another voucher. Then it will be worth $250.
What the holders of individual vouchers will do to persuade other holders to combine is up to their sense of social responsibility, not to mention their imagination, libido and patriotism.
The Obama administration will be happy because even more than $13 billion will be pumped into the economy. The Times will be happy because everyone will be treated “from each according to his ability to each according to his need.” And seniors will be happy because for a change, they’ll get laid instead of screwed.
Call your U.S. Representative today!
###
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Recovering Politicians In GAPAC Deserve Public Support, Sympathy
Recovering politicians finishing their terms of office or prison sentences because of what they did in office are being cruelly abandoned to fate, and it is time concerned Americans rallied behind the Give A Pol A Chance (GAPAC) movement.
GAPAC seeks to reach out to former politicians who admit to a Higher Power, usually the District Attorney, and help them get on the path to ordinary citizenship.
GAPAC workshops for example, deal with concepts that politicians new to the ordinary jobs Outside will find challenging, including Spending Only What You Earn, Working For Those Who Hire You, and A Full Day’s Work For A Full Day’s Pay.
Although membership in a GAPAC group has traditionally been anonymous to accommodate those used to living in a world of anonymous, sources, donors, accusers, sponsors and unindicted co-conspirators, some details of the GAPAC program have surfaced.
New members of GAPAC usually appear before their first group meeting and engage in the following ritual introduction:
New Member: Hi, my name’s well known, and this is on deep background.
Group: Hi on deep background!
Other meeting rituals include a reenactment of the original No 12-Step Program, in which any public project that would ordinarily be completed in 12 steps with nine of them contracted to your relatives is actually completed in three and under budget.
GAPAC realizes that its members are subject to a world of temptation and maintains hotlines where recovering politicians facing that temptation can find help both from GAPAC and affiliated groups:
· Recovering politicians who encounter mirrors and again find themselves falling hopelessly in love are encouraged to call 1-800-GET-UGLY, a GAPAC group that helps the overly self-esteemed cool down to room temperature, at least in public.
· Those recovering politicians who return to reality and discover multiple wives and/or mistresses, all of them unhappy, get a free copy of Paul Simon’s 1975 hit “50 Ways To Leave Your Lover” and a copy of major bus company route systems by visiting the affiliated web site itwasonlyphysical.com.
· Campaign debt and other loans are still a burden to many, so loan counseling is available at whotostiffwithoutbecomingone.com, a firm with offices in New York, Chicago and Las Vegas that specializes in short-term loans and long-term payments, boasting on its website that it has “No Living Unhappy Customers.”
Other GAPAC efforts ease reentry into ordinary social life, offering seminars on Groping Those You Don’t Employ and Hitting On Those Who Now Hit Back.
In all, support for GAPAC efforts should be a priority for all Americans who value our traditional democracy and its wonderful institutions. GAPAC asks that instead of direct contributions, sympathizers contribute to the political campaigns of their choice.
“We think of it as seed money,” a GAPAC official confided. “No matter where they start, we know they’re ours eventually.”
###
Monday, September 14, 2009
Top-Secret No More
Doofus Directorate Revealed
WASHINGTON – A previously top-secret arm of the Obama administration came to light late last week when the workings of the Doofus Directorate were discovered.
The revelation came after the Coast Guard’s scheduled September 11 anti-terrorist drill on the Potomac rattled nerves. The nerves rattled belong to the FBI and Secret Service, who get all jumpy about folks bouncing over the Potomac with machine guns while the president is nearby laying a wreath – especially when they get no advance warning.
Web chatter indicated possible White House ties, and LBS Impact Journalism put the focus on Stool Number 3 of a bar that declined to be identified near the National Press Building. There determined Inferential Reporting (IR) investigators found a 60-something white guy in a serious relationship with a glass of bourbon.
Under probing questioning, the source identified himself as Haffington A. Bubbleshy. After IR bought another round, he revealed himself as CFO (Chief Fubar Officer) of an Obama administration group so secret “even Vice President Biden couldn’t remember it.”
Asked for more than such an obviously long list, Bubbleshy tap-danced to another IR-funded bourbon and explained that he worked for the “Doofus Directorate at the White House.”
Ordinary reporters, under accounting pressure on bar tabs, might have stopped, but the IR crew pressed on, learning that the Doofus Directorate was a secret group charged with tagging the Obama White House with mistakes.
“They need us to seem human,” Bubbleshy explained. “I mean, here’s an administration headed by this black guy who’s a law professor with enough ivy on his resume to go into the landscaping business. Everything he touches seems to work eventually. You know what kind of hate and envy that’s going to generate? “
Intense IR training prompted reporters to ask “What kind?” and Bubbleshy said “The kind that comes from everyone who screws up when they see a guy who never does – so that’s where we come in.”
Keen Washington reportorial instincts prompted “Come in to do what?”
“To screw up!” Bubbleshy proudly declared. “Those Secret Service guys are always talking into their sleeves about taking a bullet for the president. Hah! We take pratfalls for the president!”
Asked for examples, Bubbleshy’s emotions were obviously a mix of caution and pride. “This is off the record, right?” he asked. “It’s not gonna be like I’m naming a CIA op or anything, right?”
Reassured with a motion for yet another bourbon, Bubbeshy smirked” You guys remember that Manhattan Air Force One flyover with those two F-16s tailing?” IR reporters nodded skillfully and Bubbleshy crowed “well that was our work!
“Just think about it!” he almost bellowed. “After the World Trade Center attacks, an apparent passenger plane flying a weird pattern over Manhattan chased by fighter jets? Panic? A White House seemingly without a clue?”
Bubbleshy paused to let his point sink in. “Don’t say so because this conversation never happened,” he said, “but you can thank the Doofus Directorate for that.”
Well, what about the Coast Guard drills, the IR reporters demanded. Was the Doofus Directorate also claiming credit for that?
“Well, no, not exactly. . .” Bubbleshy said quietly, swirling his bourbon. “That was kind of spontaneous from the Department of Homeland Security.”
“Does that bother you?” an IR reporter asked.
“Of course!” snapped Bubbleshy. “We’re getting paid to make the President look like his guys stumbled, and then these amateurs come in. What’s that gonna do to our job security?”
“You mean you have job worries?” IR reporters asked.
“Geez , don’t you guys read the papers?” said Haffington A. Bubbleshy of Plumb, VA.
###
Thursday, September 10, 2009
G.O.P. Tar Baby Tactics
Republican Secret Strategy Revealed
Seasoned political observers said Republican reaction to President Obama’s Wednesday speech on health care reform revealed new clues on Republican development and strategy.
Pointing out that most Republicans spent the evening sitting on their hands during Obama’s applause lines, analysts said it was a sound rebuttal to the charge that Republicans can’t find their asses with both hands. “The Republican party had both hands firmly in place for all to see,” said one GOP representative. Few Democrats denied the observation.
Others saw the passive Republican behavior as part of a secret Republican plan to deal with increasing Democrat demands and a shrinking Republican base by adopting a Tar Baby strategy.
Based on the folk-tale writings of Joel Chandler Harris, the Tar Baby strategy uses a dummy to smear and entangle anyone who tries to connect. An example was South Carolina Republican Representative Joe Wilson shouting out “You lie!” when Obama said the proposed health plan wouldn’t cover illegal immigrants.
That Wilson is from South Carolina affirms his dummy credentials, but close observers said he was stung by calls from both parties to apologize. Informed sources said he briefly considered South American airplane tickets for a reflective hike on the Appalachian trail using South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford’s map. Wilson ultimately apologized for his “lack of civility,” although some wondered whether fellow Republicans had applied pressure after considering the possible loss of illegal immigrant household help.
Meanwhile, designated readers at Republican pre-speech conferences also reportedly told lawmakers that B’rer Rabbit, the ensnared victim in the Tar Baby folk tale, escapes by convincing his captors to throw him into the briar patch. He convinces them he fears it most, but knows it’s his home and haven.
That reportedly energized Republican lawmakers to redouble their efforts to torpedo health care reform, secure in the knowledge that the electorate would throw them into the briar patch outer darkness most call home.
(In a side development, several Republican lawmakers reportedly expressed unease that Uncle Remus, the narrator in Harris’s folk tales, is an African American. Makes them nervous. They were reassured when designated readers explained that at the time of the narrative, Uncle Remus would have been owned by a Red State person.)
Other Republicans at the conference listened to the designated readers and asked if those who set the Tar Baby in B’rer Rabbit’s path were engaging in malicious deception and misrepresentation. There was palpable relief when the readers confirmed that behavior, prompting one Republican member of Congress to mutter “glad we’re sticking to the basics.”
###
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
President or Pretty Boy?
Tonight’s The Night For Obama
Tonight’s the night when America finds out if it elected a President in November or just a Pretty Boy who can show his teeth only when he smiles.
President Barack Obama will address a joint session of Congress and the rest of us on reforming our health care system. That Americans spend more and get less on health care is beyond dispute, but rational debate has disappeared beneath a wave of partisan point-scoring, most of it coming from the Rabid Right.
The Rabid Right strums a tune of Fear and Smear, Resent and Distort on the mindstrings of the under-educated and under-employed who form their base. Those who fear any change as another shove down the ladder become the natural allies of those who grow rich on the status quo. It is an ongoing spectacle of the exploited supporting their exploiters.
That’s one part of what a President must say tonight and one of the topics a Pretty Boy will dodge. Consensus and bi-partisanship and good feelings are all very fine, but the big decisions are about Right and Wrong and a President is elected to decide.
Decisions made are hollow unless actions follow. That’s another thing that sets Presidents apart from Pretty Boys. A Pretty Boy will support “universal health care” fervently in all ways that don’t involve doing something. A President will show his support by getting things done, making change happen, leading the country, not polling it.
President Obama and the Democrats have the votes in both the House and the Senate to pass a Health Care Reform bill. Republicans will howl, but it can be done without a single Republican vote. The Constitution doesn’t call for universal love, it calls for majority rule. President Obama and the Democrats have majorities – we don’t know yet whether they will rule.
If what we get tomorrow night are clear health reform goals, objectives and timetables, we’ll be listening to a President.
If the political message tomorrow is “We’ll remember who supported us and especially remember who opposed us,” we’re listening to a President.
If the only appeal to bi-partisanship is one to “do the right thing, not the political thing,” we’re listening to a President.
So here’s a hope that tonight’s address will be a Presidential Address.
We need one.
###
